The three presidency banks, Bank Of Bengal, Bank of Bombay and Bank of Madras,were reorganised and amalgamated to form a single entity The Imperial Bank Of India on 27/January/1921. On 30/April/1955 ,it was christened as State Bank Of India.
Imperial is royal, autocrat, and sovereign. The State bank Of India, continues to be authoritarian and arrogant, very much akin to its previous name. Names , give out the person’s character. I am an active thinker,and do not succumb to common beliefs and superstition. But , the audacity Of this biggest bank in Asia , persuades me to endorse the view.
Its officials react with unbelievable haughtiness,treat the constituents with unexpected superciliousness and behave with superiority. They seem to be o overbearing and force us to feel that they are demi gods.
The stateliest bank has prescribed its own code of conduct.Its evaluation varies from customer to customer. A constituent with millions as overdue ,gets a Kingly reaction. He is cajoled, coaxed and placed in a pedestal. He is a Royal non performer, since he has faltered to pay hundred millions- a paltry sum , according to the bureaucrats of The State Bank Of India. The genuine small time customer,who has fulfilled ,his obligations, but met with a short fall of few lakhs , is meted out with bashful arrogance.The candid customer , has repaid the small amount after three months The proud officials of the lofty bank come out with incognito loopholes, incoherent policies, unjustifiable prologues. The ire of the straight forward management will land the presumption and superiority of the bank in a congruent predilections.
