Going back and front for convenience
going through all sides easily
proclaim a dilemma.
Decisions once taken good or bad
have to be adhered strictly
be it at any cost.
Long deliberations whatsoever
bring on confusions forever
delivering a fall out.
These happen everywhere
be it in courts or arbitrations
throwing justice out.
Buying through all these ideas
gets along with a falsification
which bring not a fair deal.
Oscillations do not work
just shake the fundamentals
The laws call for no flaws
however we find more defects
that escape from the legalities
finding a loophole is as quick
as that of closing and opening the eye
with that goes the man scot-free
not answerable to any law that is found
The law books abound with clauses and sections
that carry our many instructions
being that how many of us
has read all these rules and regulations
leave alone the lay men
how many jurists would be familiar with these
one can vouchsafe that there be not a handful.
With the frailties that go to the levels much high
the judiciary seems to be a miscarriage all over
with frequent abortions on the anvil
the legalities die a natural death in the fetus
that be an opportunity for the penalised
get away from the judicial custody
entering the world with a new thought and desire.
Courts are assembling place.
Lawyers high and low gather.
Judges sit in a high place.
with great pride rather.
The lawyers make a fuss.
Telling one thing to their clients
Doing another in a feigned stress.
Judges come with determined inclines.
The trials are conducted in farce.
A make-believe effect is on the go.
The judge pretends to listen.
The lawyers cross-examine for a sake.
The plaintiffs get their expectations.
The defendants angered at the fake
go in for fresh applications.
The lower court gets it completed .
The ordeal continues in the higher courts
The loser then goes to the highest
The case find no end in all courts
unless the parties conclude in the earliest
it would drag on for years and years
consuming the life-time of the challengers.
It is not unusual that those who are wrong get credited
the losers are always the just.
That is justice in a nut shell.
This is not an experience personal
but a study of cases in general.
Lawyers keep on arguing lies
Judges go on pronouncing lies.
First lies become evidences
Then they turn out as judgements
To hear this you pay.
To receive it I pay.
They both demand highly
We both pay liberally.
They become rich quickly
We become poor even more quickly
Justice is denied to the rightful.
it is sold to the unlawful.
The courts pass orders grandly
Making the righteous penniless mostly
Transforming the erroneous wealthy immediately.
That is law in short.
That is legality in brief.
Well, that is called Justice in terms.
Fight for your rights goes the thought.
Fight for justice prompts the mind.
Fight for equality calls the experience.
Fight for truth is the much used slogan.
Well, would all these fights work out?
Would all these fights yield fruit?
Would they? Would they? is the query
that would remain unanswered for centuries.
Governance is a technique.
hard to master.
harder to execute.
hardest to find.
Governance is a criteria
calling for wisdom
Governance is a task
ensuing a discipline
initiating a schedule
maintaining a balance.
Governance is characteristic
of just and justice
of dedication and design
of reign and gain.
A dramatic turn has happened today in the Supreme court of India ,when Raveendran , Judge , recused himself from the hearing of Ambani dispute , citing a personal conflict of interest.
His daughter is employed in a firm that is a consultant to Reliance.The three member bench was constituted a few months back. At the start of the case last month, Raveendran had disclosed that he had equal amount of shares in Reliance Industries and Reliance Natural.The lawyers of the two parties raised no objection yo it.
When the nation and the investors are keenly awaiting the wrap up, this deviation seems to be a doubtful extension.The mild excuse by the judge at the stream of hearing does not have a credible breakthrough,
The withdrawal is an apparent ploy to prolong the case. In a rare gesture,the government has put its foot firmly that it is the owner of the gas.Therein lies the catch.
The clever brothers, with their cleverer counsels, will argue their case before the cleverest judges of the Supreme court. The dullest of the lot the investor, the duller of the crew the financial institutions and the dull of the entirety the nation, will watch the melodrama for years, such that of the telecasts of Ramayana and Mahabharata.
What a twist in the tail!!