That be justice
verdict pronounced without any entice
nor with lies.justice


The Oscillations

Going back and front for convenience 

going through all sides easily

proclaim a dilemma.


Decisions once taken  good or bad

have to be adhered  strictly

be  it at any cost.


Long deliberations whatsoever

bring on confusions forever

delivering a fall out.


These happen everywhere

be it in courts or arbitrations

throwing justice out.


Buying through all these ideas

gets along with a falsification

which bring not a fair deal.


Oscillations do not work

just shake the fundamentals

procrastinating the whole oscillations (1)




Where Is Law?

The laws call for no flaws
however we find more defects
that escape from the legalities
finding a loophole is as quick
as that of closing and opening the eye
with that goes the man scot-free
not answerable to any law that is found
The law books abound lawwith clauses and sections
that carry our many instructions
being that how many of us
has read all these rules and regulations
leave alone the lay men
how many jurists would be familiar with these
one can vouchsafe that there be not a handful.

With the frailties that go to the levels much high
the judiciary seems to be a miscarriage  all over
with frequent abortions on the anvil
the legalities die a natural death in the fetus
that be an opportunity for the penalised
get away from the judicial custody
entering the world with a new thought and desire.



Trial in Courts.

Courts are assembling place.
Lawyers high and low gather.
Judges sit in a high place.
with great pride rather.
The lawyers make a fuss.
Telling one thing to their clients
Doing another in a feigned stress.
Judges come with determined inclines.
The trials are conducted in farce.
A make-believe effect is on the go.
The judge pretends to listen.
The lawyers cross-examine for a sake.
The plaintiffs get their expectations.
The defendants angered at the fake
go in for fresh applications.
The lower court gets it completed .
The ordeal continues in the higher courts
The loser then goes to the highest
The case find no end in all courts
unless the parties conclude in the earliest
it would drag on for years and years
consuming the life-time of the challengers.
It is not unusual that those who areCDN-editorial-cartoon-06172011 wrong get credited
the losers are always the just.
That is justice in a nut shell.
This is not an experience personal
but a study of cases in general.


Law And Justice.

Lawyers keep on arguing lies
Judges go on pronouncing lies.
First lies become evidences
Then they turn out as judgements
To hear this you pay.
To receive it I pay.
They both demand highly
We both pay liberally.
They become rich quickly
We become poor even more quickly
Justice is denied to the rightful.
it is sold to the unlawful.
The courts pass orders grandly
Making the righteous penniless mostly
Transforming the erroneous wealthy immediately.
That is law in short.
That is legality in brief.
Well, that is called Justice in terms.justice

Actions Age Anger Experience feelings Interpretation Poem thoughts turmoil

Would They?

rightsFight for your rights goes the thought.
Fight for justice prompts the mind.
Fight for equality calls the experience.
Fight for truth is the much used slogan.
Well, would all these fights work out?
Would all these fights yield fruit?
Would they? Would they? is the query
that would remain unanswered for centuries.

Duty learning Lesson Poem subscriptions technology thoughts Wisdom

What Is Governance ?

Governance is a technique.

hard to master.

harder to execute.

hardest to find.


Governance is a criteria

calling for wisdom

requiring  skill

assuring  progress.


Governance  is a task

ensuing a discipline

initiating  a schedule

maintaining a  balance.


Governance is characteristic

of  just and justice

of dedication and design

of reign and  gain. 


Economy subscriptions thoughts

Raveendran Recuses.

A dramatic turn has happened today in the Supreme court of India ,when Raveendran , Judge , recused himself from the hearing of  Ambani dispute , citing a personal conflict of interest.

His daughter is employed in a firm that is a consultant to Reliance.The three member bench was constituted a  few months back. At the start of the case last month, Raveendran had disclosed that he had equal amount of shares in Reliance Industries and Reliance Natural.The lawyers of the two parties  raised no objection yo it.

When the nation and the investors are keenly awaiting the wrap up, this deviation seems to be a doubtful   extension.The mild excuse by the judge at the stream of hearing does not have a credible  breakthrough,

The withdrawal is an apparent ploy to prolong the case.  In a rare gesture,the government has put  its foot firmly that it is the owner of the  gas.Therein lies the catch.

 The clever brothers, with their cleverer counsels, will argue their case before the cleverest judges of the Supreme court. The dullest of the lot the investor, the duller of the crew the financial institutions and the dull of the entirety the nation, will watch the melodrama for years, such that of the telecasts of Ramayana and Mahabharata.

What a twist in the tail!!